Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article contains names and images of deceased people.
The Northern Territory court decision this week to commit Police Constable Zachary Rolfe to stand trial for the shooting death of 19-year-old Warlpiri man Kumanjayi Walker marks a historic moment in accountability for First Nations deaths in custody.
It is the first time a police officer will face a murder trial in a First Nations death in custody case in the Northern Territory in modern history.
The decision was handed down months after another policeman was charged with murder in the shooting death of an Indigenous woman in Western Australia. He has pleaded not guilty and is expected to face trial next year.
The cases are moving ahead amid a global reckoning on police and prison violence as part of the Black Lives Matter movement, which has focused new attention on First Nations families fighting for justice for the deaths of their loved ones.
Circumstances of Walker’s death
Late on the evening of November 9, 2019, five police officers entered Walker’s family home in Yuendumu, Central Australia, to try to arrest him. This set in motion the events that led to Rolfe firing the three shots that killed the teenager.
Murder charges were laid against Rolfe days later, and bail was granted the same day.
The NT Criminal Lawyers Association described the granting of bail over the phone for a serious homicide as “very unusual in the extreme“.
It also raised concerns among Yuendumu elders that justice was being compromised in Walker’s death.
Rolfe has also been stood down from the police force while on bail, but is still receiving pay.
Sufficient evidence to stand trial
Before a trial for a serious crime can proceed to the NT Supreme Court, the local court must determine whether the prosecution’s evidence is “sufficient to put the defendant on trial”. This occurs through a committal hearing.
This week, the presiding local court judge, John Birch, determined there was sufficient evidence for Rolfe to stand trial.
Birch indicated the case will proceed in Alice Springs next year unless an application is accepted by the court to move the trial to Darwin.
434 deaths in custody since 1991
There have been at least 434 First Nations deaths in custody since the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody handed down its final report in 1991.
The commission followed years of community outrage and protests over mounting Aboriginal deaths in custody. It put forward 339 recommendations that called for the use of arrest and imprisonment as a last resort, safer police and prison practices, independent investigations into deaths in custody and Aboriginal self-determination.
Yet, First Nations deaths in custody have continued in violent, reckless and negligent circumstances, reflecting the failure of governments to implement and enforce the recommendations.
Gomeroi scholar Alison Whittaker has argued colonial violence in custody has been institutionalised through the lack of accountability in First Nations death in custody cases.
This lack of accountability is pronounced in the NT, where deaths in custody and police violence rarely proceed to charges or prosecutions.
The constable was then charged with the downgraded offence of “dangerous act causing death“, which was quashed by the NT Supreme Court on statutory grounds in 2006.
Trials against police in other states
Outside the NT, two well-publicised manslaughter trials in First Nations deaths in custody cases have resulted in not guilty verdicts.
The first was in the trial of four police officers and a police aide for the death of 16-year-old Yindjibarndi man John Pat in Rosebourne police lock-up (Western Australia) in 1983. The second was Senior Constable Chris Hurley for the death of Mulrunji Doomadgee in Palm Island watch house (Queensland) in 2004.
The empanelment of all-white juries to try the officers in both cases has been questioned by justice advocates.
The Royal Commission asked in 1991 in relation to Pat’s death:
How does it come about in the Pilbara that a very important trial was conducted before a jury without Aboriginal representation, given the number of Aboriginal people in that region?
Another perceived factor behind the not guilty outcome in the Doomadgee case was the campaign run by the Queensland Police Union in support of Hurley.
Accountability and justice
From the outset, Warlpiri people in Yuendumu have been strident in their demands for justice for Walker and protections from ongoing police violence. They have also called for police there to be disarmed.
Yuendumu Elder Harry Jakamarra Nelson deplored the recent $7 million spent on the local police station. He also implicated the lasting effects of the Northern Territory Intervention in the oppression of First Nations people by taking power out of the hands of locals.
Yuendumu community members, nonetheless, recognise they have made history as a result of the murder trial.
Ned Jampijinpa Hargraves, a senior Warlpiri man and chairperson of the Warlpiri Parumpurru [Justice] Committee, said the case provides the community with “relief“.
Meanwhile, other families continue their fight for justice. This week, the NSW coroner is hearing arguments about whether a corrective services officer who shot and killed Wiradjuri man Dwayne Johnstone as he tried to escape should be referred for prosecution.
Like Walker, Johnstone was killed by an officer who fired three shots at him.
A coronial inquiry is also investigating the death of Anaiwan man Nathan Reynolds from an untreated asthma attack at a Sydney prison in 2018.
Walker’s cousin, Samara Fernandez, raised concerns earlier this year about the unequal application of the law and the lack of procedural fairness for First Nations people. She said:
You’d think it’s common sense to have a system that works equally for all populations … we want the system to be reinvented in a way that doesn’t have those stereotypes towards our people.
The dignity of procedural fairness and impartiality is the minimum First Nations families should expect when their loved one is taken by the law enforcement system.
Thalia Anthony is a professor of law at the University of Technology, Sydney. This article originally appeared on The Conversation.